Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chevrolet SS first drive (Motorauthority article)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chevrolet SS first drive (Motorauthority article)




    If your exposure to Chevrolet performance cars has included recent versions of the Camaro and the Corvette, be forewarned: The new 2014 Chevy SS might have familiar firepower under the hood, but it's a distinctly different, more understated car in nearly every other respect.
    Here's a rear-wheel-drive, mid-size sport sedan that packs a huge 415-horsepower, 6.2-liter 'LS3' V-8—the base engine from the Corvette Stingray—and all the right hardware upgrades to make the most of it.

    By that gauge, it has some true sport-sedan credentials. To call it a four-door Camaro would be an insult to this car's expert chassis tuning; just don't expect it to feel too much like a Cadillac ATS or CTS with a few frills removed.

    As we found out this past week, from the driver's seat, the SS convinced us that while it's not that, it's definitely more than a four-door pony car. It's a lot more in fact, and it deserves to be on the same stage not just with the likes of the Dodge Charger SRT8 and Chrysler 300 SRT8 but also perhaps with the Jaguar XFR, BMW 550i, and Infiniti M56 (now Q70).

    As mainstream as the bow tie on the grille is, the SS is a fringe product. In the U.S., Chevy sells more than 400,000 Silverados, around 200,000 Malibus, and more than 80,000 Camaros annually—and in the ballpark of 15,000 Corvettes a year. Yet it's only anticipating selling a few thousand Chevrolet SS models per year.

    Before we get too far into what makes the SS such a great sport sedan, we have to address the gorilla in the room: The SS is bland; it's mired in anonymity; and to pound one more nail in, it's really not as eye-catching, inside or out, as the all-new Impala that reached dealerships this year. And that factor will really limit the SS's appeal, we think.
    It's what's inside that counts




    Which is too bad, as the SS is quite a beautifully executed car—if you can see beyond the plain face. The SS might as well stand for Sleeper Sedan, as it's one of the best smokin'-fast under-the-radar four-doors ever…of the sort that, if you can keep your right foot light on the accelerator when you're cruising past patrol cars or through small towns, you'll likely roll through unnoticed—as what to the uninitiated might just as well be some kind of rental car or fleet vehicle.

    Back in Australia, where the SS is assembled, that might not be the case. The SS is a thinly veiled, only somewhat restyled and rebadged version of the Holden Commodore SS V, the latest flagship in a long line of cars that are worshipped by Aussies the way we bow to Mustangs and Camaros.

    It’s also worth noting, by the way, that the SS is not just a new version of the Pontiac G8 GXP—a car that was based on the previous ‘VE’ iteration of the Holden Commodore. In a separate post, we outline all the differences—and they’re significant.

    From the driver's seat, the new SS is just enough of that sleeper sedan it is on the outside, but definitely an extrovert at heart. On a variety of suburban, mountain, and desert roads around Palm Springs, California, the SS would feel at ease on most daily commutes, yet it’s dynamically rewarding in nearly every way you’d expect—and a true performance model.

    It's pretty impressive given how the SS doesn't have any tricks up its sleeve in the way of multi-mode steering, an adjustable suspension, or even dual-path/adaptive dampers. It's just been really well calibrated—with the goods to take on serious driving roads, yet just enough comfort for those in areas with relatively good road quality.
    The big 6.2 [can we call it the SS 376?] has loads of tire-smoking torque on tap from a standstill, with the right bassy bellow to match—and a crackling intensity at higher revs—but thanks to a nice, linear throttle feel you can take off in a careful, controlled manner if you want. It also permits you to roll neatly onto the accelerator out of corners to not upset its balance. And on that subject, we also appreciate how when you manually select gears, the transmission will hold higher gears even if you floor the accelerator (or summon a downshift as soon as it's within the rev range when slowing down).

    Rest of the car's wearing a track suit while the transmission's wearing a bow tie

    The only disappointment with the fundamentals is with the transmission, which doesn't have the performance coordination and finesse of the rest of the powertrain and chassis and feels fit for a comfort car, not a performance sedan. There's a long (almost one-one-thousand), delay to downshifts after you click the left side. Stomping my right foot to the floor in Drive seemed to order up a downshift faster than at part throttle with the paddle. Ratios feel very tall with the included 3.27 final drive, as well.

    Transmission aside, the SS is presented in a convincing way for enthusiastic—even track—driving, with Brembo front brakes that include four-piston actuation and two-piece rotors and calipers (rear brakes are solid discs). The weight distribution is nearly 50/50 (52/48); and the center of mass is kept low thanks to an aluminum hood and deck lid, among other things. Forged 19-inch aluminum wheels help set a strong stance and are shod in staggered-width Bridgestone summer-performance—245/40ZR19 in front, 275/35ZR19 at the rear.

    Curb weight, at 3,975 pounds, is on the hefty side, so it's certainly not overweight relative to the competition; yet one of the first impressions as the road tightens and you push faster is that you're throwing a lot of weight around.

    Part of the blame is that the tires have a dramatic difference in grip from cold to hot. For the first few sharp corners, they’re vocal and dramatically...lacking. But after properly warmed up they’re noticeably sticker while also feeling far more confidence-inspiring and progressive—allowing some pretty fluid driving and far more neutral, fun behavior than the cold tires initially suggest. All the while, the stability control system here also let’s you have fun with it to a reasonable degree and doesn’t get in the way.

    By the way, Chevy recommends Blizzak2 winter tires for those in the Snow Belt, and we think those a little farther south will want to go for that too.



    Decent steering, great driving position



    The steering wheel itself was a peeve of both me and my co-driver. It’s very thick—impractically so, we think. And the so-called TAPshift paddles for manual control feel more like wobbly buttons on the back of the steering wheel than satisfying paddle-shifters. But we do like the rack-mounted electric power steering here—a new unit from Korean supplier Mando, co-developed by GM. It loads up nicely, with a hefty but settled feel on center as well.

    Colleagues were complaining of a lack of road feel, but I'm not sure what they were expecting (I took the car back out with that in mind). We could even feel a bit of road surface through the steering near the limit, which to us puts it a step above some other sport-sedan steering gear from more prestigious brands. It’s definitely more lively than what’s used in the Dodge Charger SRT8.

    Brakes also felt strong—easy to modulate and with a firmer pedal compared to most other GM products. But one of the test cars we drove already had pulsating brakes from a day of hard on-the-road driving, so we're curious how they hold up out on the track.

    We really like the driving position; you don’t sit quite as low to the ground as in some other sport sedans, but the up side, combined with the somewhat boxy body, is that you have lots of outward visibility. It was quite possible for this 6’-6” driver to find a position that’s quite upright and yet have plenty enough headroom left.

    The SS measures at the long end of mid-size (nearly 196 inches long, nearly 115 inches of wheelbase), yet it's less than 75 inches wide. You can scoot the front seat far back, for as much legroom as a basketball player would want; and provided it’s in a reasonably ‘normal’ position there’ll be plenty of space left for a couple of rear-seat passengers. We can’t imagine fitting three adults across, though.

    The trunk is nicer than we expected; it’s nicely finished, with plenty of space for a couple of large suitcases, and there’s a pass-through for longer items.

    Some details lacking... Forgivable at half the price of an XFR?

    We can say pretty much the opposite for under the hood, though. We were disappointed by the sea of black, semi-glossy injection-molded plastic covering most of what's in the engine bay; it seems like the company would have put a little more into an engine bay that people will want to show friends and neighbors.

    As for ride quality, we're going to say that it's simply not as sophisticated as that of most luxury-brand sport sedans today. The roads around Palm Springs are pretty smoothly surfaced, and we did notice that the SS's firm calibration brought some pitchiness over highway patches and heaves. Yet they've done a great job sealing out road and wind noise.

    Interior detailing felt great, however, with excellent seats, top-tier switchgear, and a plush suede-like trim for the upper half of the instrument panel. Full Chevrolet MyLink infotainment is included, as well as a long list of active-safety features. The only options are a full-size spare and a sunroof.

    In all, the SS is priced at around $45,000, which seems about right based on how we see it fitting into the market. It feels far more athletic than the somewhat lower-priced Taurus SHO and feels more fluid and willing to dance than an almost identically priced Charger SRT8.

    The engine in the SS (and its sound) might very well seduce you, too; but it has lacks the ride sophistication, the styling, and a transmission that's worthy of the rest of the car's potential.

    If you're the kind to be intrigued by the idea of a generally well-tuned, 415-horsepower sport sedan, at a fraction of the price of others with comparable performance—and you might consider the sleeper status an asset—then you must take this one for a drive.

  • #2
    Nice report - thanks for posting!

    Just read C&D's comparison between the SS & Charger SRT8. Even though the SRT8 was slightly quicker, considerably faster, and more lavishly equipped, the SS won the match on comfort, handling & feel, and fun quotient/driver involvement. They're calling the SS a true driver's car. It even out-corners the the current M5 & A6, as well as the last CTS-V.

    Joel
    There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. - Frank Zappa

    Comment


    • #3
      Too many doors for me and for 45K I would get a new Vette.

      Comment


      • #4
        Here's an article on the SS vs the SRT8 Charger:

        Reign Supreme: SS meets SRT8 in a precipitous battle of modern-day muscle



        DECEMBER 2013
        BY MIKE SUTTON
        PHOTOGRAPHY BY DANIEL BYRN

        Chevrolet laid its groundwork for the new Super Sport (SS) with a profile body for the 2013 NASCAR circuit. The racing Chevy SS and the racing Dodge Charger would have each been that rarest of things: a V-8 rear-drive Sprint Cup competitor modeled after a V-8 rear-drive production car. But the SS arrived just as Dodge quit the series, so fans were cheated.

        Instead, the speedway rivalry that never was has simply moved out to the parking lot. The production SS squares off here, on a rainy weekend, against the Dodge Charger SRT8. The latter has strutted alone in Detroit’s arena of civilian rear-wheel-drive muscle sedans since 2009, when GM pulled Pontiac’s plug and with it the SS’s excellent predecessor, the G8. While both the Charger and SS are more sensible than their two-door siblings, the Challenger and the Camaro, these old-school tire smokers cement their relevance by not really giving a damn about it.

        Still, Chevrolet wants you to know that its new halo sedan is the brand’s first rear-drive four-door V-8 in nearly 20 years. The SS is as American as can be for a Euro-inspired car built in Elizabeth, South Australia, which is absolutely nowhere near Sydney or any place with a working telephone. Known as the Holden Commodore SS in its home market, the Chevy SS is GM’s third attempt to domesticate one of its excellent Australian models—after the ill-fated Pontiac GTO coupe and G8 sedan.

        The Commodore’s current VF chassis (so named for the Aussie fashion of giving each new version of a model its own two-letter code) has been updated from the VE structure that we loved in the G8, but it’s still the same bits that's underneath the stubbier Chevrolet Camaro and the stretched Caprice PPV police cruiser. Additional aluminum in the suspension, subframes, hood, and trunklid helps the SS shed more than 100 pounds from the G8. The Aussies paid special attention to overall refinement and noise insulation, while a new electrical system supports all of the company’s latest safety and entertainment gear, including the feared switch to electric power steering.

        A low-volume unicorn for the brand, the handful of SSs to be imported each year will all be pretty much fully equipped and ready to boogie for $45,770, including a $1300 gas-guzzler fee slapped on the sole engine—a 415-hp, 6.2-liter LS3 V-8. GM’s six-speed 6L80 automatic is sadly the only transmission offered. Although a power sunroof ($900) and a spare tire ($500) are optional, the sporty suspension, Brembo front brakes, and 19-inch wheels with performance tires are all standard.

        The Charger SRT8 was last updated in 2012. It’s now a thoroughly modern muscle car, with a sinister mien, a 470-hp 6.4-liter Hemi V-8, driver-adjustable adaptive suspension, and even larger Brembo brakes all around. The Charger also is automatic-only, with just an old five-speed unit until ZF’s ubiquitous eight-speed enters service.

        Although budget Super Bee versions of the 2014 SRT start at $45,380 (including $1000 in guzzler tax), the regular SRT is $3000 more and closer to 50 grand when equipped like the Chevrolet. Our test car was a 2013 model mechanically identical to the 2014 SRT; it blossomed from its $47,475 base price to $55,150 with the 2013-only 392 Edition appearance package ($2495), as well as a Harman/Kardon audio system ($1995) and Laguna leather seats ($1495), plus summer performance rubber and a few electronic watchdogs and gizmos that are standard on the SS.

        As chest-thumping totems for their respective makes, these cars are here to claim bragging rights. So, after the obligatory burnouts, we headed for the last vestiges of fall color in rain-soaked northern Michigan to see which car best re-imagines the great American performance sedan.

        Second Place - Dodge Charger SRT8 392 HEMI



        With roots in the DaimlerChrysler era, the Charger, like the Chevy, has global genes. (It’s imported, too, from an assembly plant in Ontario, Canada.) But as a proper Mopar, the SRT8 is simply bigger and badder looking than the Chevy ever will be.

        The Charger’s extra-strength Hemi rumbles to life with authority and always feels ready to overwhelm the rear Goodyears with its 470 pound-feet of torque. Our best runs happened without the car’s launch-control software and required a careful throttle foot to optimize wheelspin. Get it right and 60 mph passes in 4.2 seconds, three ticks quicker than in the SS. A similar gap exists at the quarter-mile mark (12.6 seconds to 12.9), with the Charger reaching 114 mph to the Chevy’s 111. The momentum continues to a drag-limited 178 mph, long after the SS’s 160-mph governor kicks in.

        While the SRT’s 0.90 g of grip on the skidpad can’t match the Chevrolet’s amazing 0.95-g effort, it did need one less foot to stop from 70 mph (in a short 152 feet). It almost tied the SS’s speed in our slalom test and returned the same 17-mpg average during our 700-mile road trip. Recognizing the importance of such figures to owners, Dodge includes a nifty performance meter in the Charger’s cluster, as well as cup-holder-like recesses in the underhood plastic for lengthy driveway debates about pushrods and engine-block paint.

        The big Dodge looks the bruiser, too, particularly with our 392’s black accents and darkened 20-inch wheels.  A numbered badge on the console lends some exclusivity, even though the black roof and rollers are available on all SRT-fettled Chargers. Combined with the beat of a large-displacement V-8, the SRT8 channels the old-timey vibe of  the Pentastar’s Nixon-era classics.



        But with 19 points separating it and the SS, along with higher base and as-tested prices, the Charger would need to actually transport us back to Woodward Avenue in its heyday to be considered the winner. At 4371 pounds, the Dodge is 440 pounds heavier than the Chevy and feels every ounce of  it. Its dashboard is as wide as a Ram pickup’s, and the pinched windows and high cowl amplify the sense of corpulence.

        An overly stiff suspension carries the bulk. Body roll is tolerable and the adjustable dampers give tight control with auto, sport, and track settings, but all the choices are excessively firm. The stiff legs unsettle the chassis over sections of road that didn’t faze the Chevrolet. Along with hydraulically assisted steering that’s somehow less communicative than the SS’s electric setup, the Charger is a blunt weapon that feels large and detached in rough use.

        Despite the intuitive touch screen, heated-and-cooled cup holders, and adaptive cruise control, the Dodge’s inferiority creeps into its cabin like a haze of burnt rubber. Some of us preferred the support of the thickly bolstered SRT seats, but overall material quality, design and refinement fall well short of the overachieving Chevy’s.

        The SRT’s loud-and-proud character is true to muscle-car tradition, and that’s sufficient for many in the Mopar choir. But the SS is simply the better car in every other measure.




        Highs - A Hemi V-8, classic Mopar ’tude, user-friendly controls.

        Lows - Brutal ride, brittle interior, feels massive, muted steering, can get expensive.

        Verdict - A retro powerhouse proudly short on grace.


        First Place - Chevrolet Super Sport



        GM’s ex-executive car guy Bob Lutz said the Pontiac G8 was too good to waste and might return to the U.S. someday as a Chevrolet, and he did not lie. The SS is proof.

        Largely inspired by the 1997–2003 E39 BMW 5-series, the SS’s Holden chassis is a monument to sports-sedan fundamentals. Whereas the Charger bucks about and struggles for grip on rough, twisty pavement, the Chevrolet’s nonadjustable, one-size-fits-all suspension keeps it compliant yet planted on sticky Bridgestones. The accelerator pedal can adjust the car’s cornering attitude as effectively as the precise steering, which progressively builds in feedback and effort despite some numbness on-center. With plenty of confidence, the SS’s lateral grip bests not only that from GM’s last Cadillac CTS-V, but the current Audi S6 and BMW M5 as well.

        Much of the SS’s poise is due to good front-rear distribution of its 3931 pounds, barely 100 more than the latest front-drive Impala sedan with a V-6. The firm brakes feel more responsive managing the lower mass. The car also changes direction quickly and more assertively than Dodge’s freighter does.




        Although the 6.2-liter small-block is down 55 horsepower to the big Hemi, the Chevy’s lighter weight and better traction make it easier to launch at the test track and just as quick as its rival out in the real world. The 12.9-second quarter-mile pass is a solid performance. A superior transmission helps to hurry things, with the six-speed shifting smoothly and never hunting for the proper ratio. The SS still deserves a true manual, but the 6L80’s “sport” setting wakes up the car without being annoying, and the wheel-mounted paddles click off rev-matched downshifts that the Charger’s smaller, slipperier spoke toggles can’t.

        The Chevrolet is more pleasant to cruise in, too, with great seats all around and premium details. The SS doesn’t have the supercharged pull or the big price tag of the burly CTS-V, but it feels like the Caddy’s equal or better in refinement and overall quality. GM’s latest MyLink interface works well in the SS’s sensible layout, which no longer includes the odd, foreign-market quirks found in the old G8 and GTO.

        While the LS3 gently rocks the car at idle and emits a rowdy snarl from its pipes, the SS lacks the Charger’s outright swagger on the street. It’s classier and more reserved in its athleticism, despite its purposeful stance. Having to correct the unacquainted that this is not a fancy Malibu is one of the SS driver’s very few irritants, along with the car’s limited availability. We expect that Chevy will import only a few thousand examples each year. After our time in both comparo cars, though, the SS’s 45 grand feels completely justified. Even a bargain for what you get.

        The SS is a rare gem whose name underscores its well-deserved place in Chevy’s heritage. It may not be made in America, but the SS is perfectly at home here.




        Highs - Excellent handling balance, refined interior, great looks, potent LS3 V-8.

        Lows - Limited availability, could be mistaken for lesser Chevys, no manual offered.

        Verdict - The gifted offspring of a BMW M5 and a Chevy Camaro SS.


        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah, that's the article I mentioned in my last post. If I was in the market for a new car, the SS would definitely be on my short list.

          Joel
          There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. - Frank Zappa

          Comment


          • #6
            Interesting articles.

            Comment


            • #7
              I like the subtle looks no boy racer, no rice, yet it will kick your ass lol.

              Comment

              Working...
              X