interesting

but i think it's uglier then sin, just hideous. take it away...

[old vette dog]

The back looks good but the car is ugly

[smooth_358]

umm, ya.. definately looks terrible

[HOTCIVIC]

As bad as it is, there's something cool about it. Maybe I just love Chevelles so much that I want it to work.

[HerrKooled]

The back looks good but the car is ugly

really? i thought the opposite, i like the front of the top 2 pictures, but i thought the rear looked horrible, very toy like.

[HOTCIVIC]

It's a '04-'06 GTO underneath right?

[old vette dog]

really? i thought the opposite, i like the front of the top 2 pictures, but i thought the rear looked horrible, very toy like.

THe mustang rims kinda ruin it for me.

[Guest]

Lol, the very first pic looking at the rear end reminded me of an early seventies duster for some reason. The front end doesn't remind me of a Chevelle at all.

[MR.hp]

Pretty sure that was the car that was at car craft a couple of years ago and it is built on a new GTO platform. The guy promoting the car said they were doing a reto chevelle and the car was going to be like 80K. GM had a tough time selling GTO's at 30K, Does not do anything for me.

[Guest]

I think the GTO failed simply on the looks. The aftermarket came up with kits that looked a lot more like what a GTO should look like. Especially the scoops.

[HOTCIVIC]

I think the GTO failed simply on the looks. The aftermarket came up with kits that looked a lot more like what a GTO should look like. Especially the scoops.

I always liked this one:

[Guest]

Yep, and it was something easy for them to do.